Reviewer path

This page is for a reviewer who wants to evaluate the repository in about 10 minutes.

The goal is not to read every block. The goal is to verify that the project already demonstrates an engineering route with reproducible evidence.

10-minute route

Open these pages in order:

1. Course demo dashboard
2. Course status
3. Model → FPGA → RF → Measurement
4. Hardware checklist
5. End-to-end SDR demo roadmap
6. Reviewer acceptance checklist
7. Portfolio view

What each page proves

Page	What to verify
Demo dashboard	the repository already contains executable or generated artifacts
Course status	block maturity is tracked explicitly instead of implied
Model → FPGA → RF → Measurement	the repository has a coherent engineering chain
Hardware checklist	hardware work is treated as a disciplined measurement task
End-to-end SDR demo roadmap	the project aims for complete model-to-measurement closure
Reviewer acceptance checklist	pass/fail criteria are stated explicitly instead of being implied
Portfolio view	the repository is intentionally positioned as a serious engineering artifact

Fast reviewer verdict

The repository is already strong if you can confirm these points:

1. Documentation and engineering route are connected.
2. At least some labs are executable or CI-backed.
3. Hardware work is described with safety and metadata discipline.
4. The project is useful both as a course and as a portfolio artifact.

If you have 2 minutes only

Open:

1. Demo dashboard
2. Course status
3. Reviewer acceptance checklist
4. Portfolio view

That is the shortest path to evaluate maturity, evidence and presentation quality.